Assess the talents and limitations of employing overt individual observation as a means of investigating police thinking. (15 marks) Overt player observation involves the specialist being open with the group they are going to examine. This means they are able to over-see the experiment that is certainly taking place although being involved in it. A positive of using this method when researching police behaviour is that as the investigator will be involved in the experiment; they may gain first-hand experience of the situations the fact that police are in and will be able to better understand why law enforcement react the way they do to each specific condition. For example , if the situation converts violent for just about any reason, the observer can understand why law enforcement officials have to make use of the amount of force they do just to detain the felony. Another great is that if the observation is usually overt it means that the investigator is able to readily take paperwork as they will not have to make-believe to be section of the group. This approach would charm to interpretivists as it will create qualitative data which in turn would be open to interpretation. It could also show that the information will be more valid as the researcher more than likely have to rely on their memory space of the days and nights experiment to write up all their findings. A weakness of using overt participant remark, however , would be that the quality of the data collected type this research may be jeopardised by the individual reactivity created by the researcher making their very own presence evident to the group. For example , if the police happen to be acting improperly, they would not want this to be produced apparent towards the public thus if they knew they were being noticed they would modify their actions to make that seem as if they are carrying out their careers properly and sticking to the principles. This is also referred to as ‘Hawthorne effect' and because the participants may act untruthfully, the outcomes of the experiment will not be consultant or valid. Being honest about researching a...