Effects of Switching Boundaries on Fulfillment, Repurchase Intentions and Attitudinal Loyalty

Claes-Robert Julander Ragnar Söderberg Teacher of Business Administration Centre for Consumer Marketing Stockholm School of Economics1

Magnus Söderlund Relate Professor Middle for Customer Marketing Stockholm School of Economics

SSE/EFI Working Paper Series running a business Administration. No . 2003: 1 ) Stockholm: January 2003.

one particular

Claes-Robert Julander Stockholm School of Economics Box 6501 se 113 83 Stockholm Sweden Phone: +468 736 90 13 Fax: +468 33 94 89 Email: claes-robert. [email protected] se

Associated with Switching Obstacles on Pleasure, Repurchase Motives and Attitudinal Loyalty

FUZY The positive effect of customer satisfaction in repurchase motives and attitudinal loyalty has been shown in numerous studies. The effect of switching barriers on these types of variables, however , have been subject to much less interest from research workers. In this examine we suggest that switching limitations can be seen since either positive or bad, and we examine their results on customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions and attitudinal loyalty. A LISREL examination of the empirical data demonstrates negative transitioning barriers possess negative effects in customer satisfaction and attitudinal commitment, but an optimistic effect on repurchase intentions. Confident switching limitations impinge efficiently on customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions and attitudinal loyalty. Keywords: Switching limitations, loyalty, pleasure, repurchase intentions


Advantages Numerous studies show that customer satisfaction is related to repurchase intentions and attitudinal dedication (Cronin & Taylor, 1992; Fornell, 1992; Anderson & Sullivan, 1990; Boulding, Kalra, Staeling, & Zeithaml, 1993; Taylor & Baker 1994; de Ruyter, Wetzels, & Bloemer, mil novecentos e noventa e seis; Zeithamel, Fruit, & Parasuraman, 1996; Mägi & Julander 1996). Yet , customer satisfaction by no means explains each of the variation in repurchase motives or attitudinal loyalty, seeing that customers almost never are totally free to choose suppliers. In fact , various kinds of constraints, as well as customer satisfaction, decide customers choice of supplier (Bendapudi & Berry 1997). Through this paper this kind of constraints will be termed turning barriers. Just one or two empirical studies, however , investigate how various types of moving over barriers have an effect on satisfaction with suppliers, repurchase intentions, attitudinal loyalty and the relationships between these parameters (Jones, Mothersbaugh, & Beatty, 2000). It is often pointed out, starting with Hirschman, that customers stay loyal into a supplier either because they need to or they should (Hirschman, 70; Johnson, 1982; Levinger, lates 1970s; Ping, 1993). High turning barriers show that customers need to stay (or perceive that they have to) with suppliers, irrespective of the satisfaction made in the romantic relationship. Such constrained freedom of preference could, in respect to reactance theory, generate lower fulfillment, repurchase motives and attitudinal loyalty compared to a more unconstrained situation (cf. Ringold, 1988). Both via a assumptive and a managerial perspective it is of interest to investigate how switching boundaries affect pleasure, repurchase intentions and attitudinal loyalty. Frankly, the assumptive framework built up around client satisfaction and commitment needs to combine switching boundaries (Bendapudi & Berry 1997), and treat several queries that as of yet have received small attention. How important are they to get customer preservation, loyalty and repurchase motives? Do switching barriers connect to satisfaction and this way enhance loyalty or perhaps do that they affect obtain intentions and long-term consumer loyalty on their own of satisfaction? Are switching barriers a unidimensional idea or are generally there different types of turning


obstacles - with unique results on customer satisfaction, customer devotion and repurchase intentions?...

Sources: Anderson, Elizabeth. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1990). The Antecedents and Effects of Customer Satisfaction for Businesses. Marketing Scientific research, 12(2), 125-145. Bendapudi, D., & Fruit, L. T. (1997). Customers´ Motivation for Maintaining Interactions with Companies. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 15-37. Boulding, W. A., Kalra, A., Staeling, L., &. Zeithaml V. A. (1993). A Dynamic Process Model of Services Quality: By Expectations to Behavioral Motives. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(1), 7-27. Cronin J. J., & The singer S. A. (1992). Calculating Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extendable. Journal of promoting, 56(3), 55-68. de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Bloemer, J. (1996). Around the Relationship Between Perceived Services Quality and Behavioral Intentions: a Cross-sectional Perspective. Actions of the 25th EMAC Seminar, Warwick, UK. Fornell, C. (1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Encounter. Journal of promoting, 56(1), 6-21. Hausknecht, Deb. R. (1990). Measurement Scales in Consumer Satisfaction /Dissatisfaction. Journal of Consumer Fulfillment, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 3, 1-11. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Tone of voice, and Dedication: Responses to Decline in Firms, Businesses, and States. Cambridge, MUM: Harvard University Press. Williams, M. A., Mothersbaugh, Deb. L., & Beatty, S i9000. E. (2000). Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services. Log of Selling, 76(2), 259-74. Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. D., & Beatty, S. At the. (2002). So why Customers Stay: Measuring the Underlying Proportions of Solutions Switching Costs and Managing their Gear Service Final results. Journal of Business Study, 55(6), 441-50. Johnson, M. P. (1982). Social and Cognitive Top features of the Dissolution of Determination to Human relationships. In H. Duck (Ed. ), Personal Relationships: Dissolving Personal Interactions (pp. 51-74). London: Academics Press. Klemperer, P. G. (1987). Marketplaces with Customer Switching Costs. Quarterly Record of Economics, 102(2), 375-394.


Levinger, G. (1979). Marital Cohesiveness at the Brink: The Fortune of Applications for Divorce. In T. L. Huston (Ed), Divorce and Separating: Context, Triggers, and Consequences (pp. 99-120). New York: Academics Press. Lund, M. (1985). The Development of Expenditure and Determination Scales to get Predicting Continuity of Personal Interactions. Journal of Social and private Relationships, 2(2), 3-23. Morgan, R. Meters., & Look, S. M. (1994). The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38. Mägi, A., & Julander, C. -R. (1996). Identified Service Top quality and Pleasure in a Retail store Profit Efficiency Framework - An Empirical Study of Swedish Grocery Retailers. Diary of Retailing and Client Services, 3(1), 33-41. Nilssen, T. (1992). Two Sorts of Consumer Turning Costs. Rand Journal of Economics, 23(4), 579-589. Titled ping, R. (1993). The Effects of Satisfaction and Strength Constraints about Retailer Exiting, Voice, Commitment, Opportunism, and Neglect. Diary of Selling, 69(3), 320352. Ping, 3rd there�s r. (1997). Voice in Business-to-Business Relationships: Cost-of-Exit and Market Antecedents. Diary of Selling, 73(2), 261-281. Ping, Ur. (1999). Unexplored antecedents of Exiting within a Marketing Funnel. Journal of Retailing, 75(2), 218-241. Ringold, D. L. (1988). Client Response to Merchandise Withdrawal: The Reformulation of Coca-Cola. Mindset & Marketing, 5(3), 189-210. Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. L., & Morrow, G. G. (1986). Determinants and Outcomes of Get out of, Voice, Dedication, and Neglect: Responses to Dissatisfaction in Adult Passionate Relationships. Human being Relations, 39(1), 45-63. Rust, R. T., Zahorik, A. J., & Keiningham, Big t. L. (1995). Return in Quality (ROQ): Making Support Quality Financially Accountable. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 58-70. Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L. (1994). An Assessment of the Relationship Between Service Top quality and Client satisfaction in the Development of Consumers' Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70(2), 163-178. Yi, Y. (1990). A Critical Report on Consumer Satisfaction. In V. A. Zeithaml (Ed. ), Review of Advertising, American Marketing Association, Chicago, il Zeithaml, Versus. A., Fruit, L. D., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.


twenty two